Drupal Sites

drupal-500

The 500 highest-ranked Drupal sites in the Tranco list.

Index 12.0 · scanned 2026-10-11 · up to 32 URLs per site · 500 organizations · 443 scanned (88.6% coverage)

Median score 55 across 443 sites
Middle half 43–63 spread around the median
Full range 28–77 lowest to highest
Gated 193 of 443 block AI crawlers outright

Middle of 14 cohorts. All cohorts 50 · best cohort 58.

Where this list came from

The source, and how we filtered it

Source Tranco top sites list, Tranco (Le Pochat et al., NDSS 2019) (2026-09-06)
LicensePublished for research use and redistributable. Each daily list has its own permanent identifier, which is what a citation has to name — 'the Tranco list' on its own is not reproducible.
How we filtered itEvery site in the list, in rank order, had its homepage read once (one request, our declared user agent) and tested by census/drupal.py for Drupal. The same response is tested for all three technology cohorts, so a site is read once however many cohorts it might be in, and belongs to at most one: where two technologies match, the stronger evidence wins and the other is named on the row. The position in the cohort is 1..n in Tranco order and nothing is ever reordered by anything of ours. Only medium confidence and above is admitted: one weak signal is a coincidence waiting to be pointed out, and a wrong row is somebody in that community finding a site in our list that is not Drupal, and being right. Every row carries the signals that decided it, so a disagreement can be about that site rather than about the number. A site is one row per registered domain, taken from where its homepage finally landed, so a company's country domains that redirect to one site are one row, at the best Tranco rank among them. The URL is the root of the landing host.
Instead ofBuiltWith and Wappalyzer datasets, which are licensed. Also Drupal.org case studies and the Association's showcase, which self-select toward flattering examples and cannot be the base of a survey.
Built2026-10-11

The filtering is ours and is disclosed as ours. The source published a list; the decision about which rows of it belong in a cohort was a judgment call, and it is written down so somebody can disagree with it.

Distribution

Where the 443 sites land

GradeShare of the cohort SitesShare
Adequate
159 35.9%
Not ready
98 22.1%
Weak
183 41.3%
Strong
3 0.7%
By dimension

What the cohort earns, dimension by dimension

The mean share of each dimension’s available points that this cohort earned. Low here means the whole sector is weak on it, not that one site dragged an average down. The per-site spread is in the dataset.

DimensionMean share earned Mean
#1 · Reach
These parameters determine the fundamental ease of access that AI has to your site information.
72%
#2 · Read
AI generally turns off JavaScript. Does your site information survive without it?
46%
#3 · Understand
Does a machine know who and what you are?
28%
#4 · Act
Sitemaps, redirects, 404s, licensing terms, and not wasting the crawl budget.
68%
How much of each site we read

The cap is 32 URLs and it is a ceiling, not a promise. A portal whose every link points at a different host yields one page; a university yields the full sample. The median here is 32, the range 1–32, published so that "we sampled 32 URLs per site" cannot become a claim the data does not support.

21 sites in this cohort served a certificate we could not verify. They were read anyway and scored normally, because reporting no response for a site every browser loads would describe our TLS stack rather than the site, and each one carries the finding in its row.

Where this cohort fails

7 tests almost nobody in this cohort passes

Universal — nobody passes these 7 checks · 2 of them worth 2 points or more
TestWhat it asks FailingOf Points
ACT-3 If you have a public API, is it described in a standard file?
100.0%
4 2
EXT-12 Do you tell search engines the moment a page changes?
100.0%
443 0
EXT-15 Can an AI agent find out how to sign in to your site?
100.0%
4 0
EXT-16 Do you publish a card or a skills list for the agents you run?
100.0%
443 0
EXT-17 Do you list your agents in your domain's DNS records?
100.0%
395 0
EXT-7 If you run real question-and-answer pages, are they marked as such?
100.0%
9 0
UND-9 If a page is behind a paywall, does it say so?
100.0%
9 2
Near-universal — 95% and above 10 checks · 2 of them worth 2 points or more
TestWhat it asks FailingOf Points
EXT-11 Have you marked the part of a page that answers a spoken question?
99.5%
443 0
PST-2 Have you posted a Content Signals statement about what AI may do with your content?
99.1%
443 0
RED-10 Do you offer a plain-text (Markdown) copy of your pages?
98.9%
348 2
EXT-14 Does your site offer its actions to AI browsers as tools?
98.6%
440 0
EXT-13 Can an assistant ask your site a question directly?
97.5%
443 0
RED-12 If a machine asks for Markdown, does your site give it?
97.3%
443 2
EXT-4 Can an AI assistant connect to your site as a tool?
97.1%
443 0
EXT-18 Do you tell AI shoppers how they can pay?
96.4%
28 0
PST-4 Have you reserved your text and data mining rights in a form machines can read?
96.2%
443 0
RED-5 Do your PDFs and images have their own rules for search and quoting?
96.2%
339 1
Common — 90 to 95% 6 checks · 3 of them worth 2 points or more
TestWhat it asks FailingOf Points
EXT-1 Do you publish an llms.txt file for coding assistants?
94.8%
443 0
UND-5 Does the author label in your page code point to that person?
93.6%
328 1
EXT-2 Do you list your APIs and agent tools where agents look for them?
93.3%
15 0
UND-6 Are your published and updated dates honest and visible?
91.6%
443 6
UND-1 Does your site say clearly who you are?
90.7%
443 2
UND-2 Does your site use the page labels that search engines still read for what you publish?
90.0%
30 3

Coral bars mark tests worth 2 points or more, the failures that actually move a score.

Every site

Every 500, named, with a report for each

Whether or not it has been scanned. Rows with no website on record, sites that were unreachable and sites that turned us away stay in the table with the reason on them, and none of them enters an average: dropping them would shrink the population to the part that was easy to measure. A few points between two neighbors is noise. The box filters every row in the cohort, not only the page you are on; click a header to sort the rows on this page by name or by score.

Showing 401–500 of 500 · page 5 of 5

SiteScore GatedPages read Report
vassar.edu vassar.eduTranco rank 16491 70 No 32
iwm.org.uk iwm.org.ukblockedTranco rank 16500; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
kidney.org kidney.orgblockedTranco rank 16516; not measured: HTTP 403 — No —
universityofcalifornia.edu universityofcalifornia.eduTranco rank 16540 77 No 32
edf.fr edf.frTranco rank 16545 38 Gated 22
governo.it governo.itTranco rank 16553 34 Gated 1
fanniemae.com fanniemae.comblockedTranco rank 16580; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
supermicro.com supermicro.comTranco rank 16619 47 Gated 32
vov.vn vov.vnblockedTranco rank 16659; not measured: HTTP 403 — No —
dnaindia.com dnaindia.comTranco rank 16712 39 Gated 32
giz.de giz.deTranco rank 16780 69 No 32
freundin.de freundin.deTranco rank 16813 63 No 32
meteofrance.fr meteofrance.frTranco rank 16868 63 No 32
ucsusa.org ucs.orgTranco rank 16880 68 No 32
trinity-health.org trinity-health.orgTranco rank 16940 67 No 32
verbraucherzentrale.de verbraucherzentrale.deTranco rank 17011 63 No 32
icc-cpi.int icc-cpi.intTranco rank 17052 50 Gated 1
gcu.edu gcu.eduTranco rank 17056 68 No 32
sipri.org sipri.orgTranco rank 17103 64 No 32
programiz.com programiz.comTranco rank 17125 51 Gated 32
orgs.biz orgs.bizTranco rank 17150 45 Gated 32
netpulse.com us.egym.comTranco rank 17168 55 No 32
metu.edu.tr metu.edu.trTranco rank 17186 70 No 32
rivm.nl rivm.nlTranco rank 17203 61 No 32
polito.it polito.itTranco rank 17206 62 Gated 32
totalenergies.com totalenergies.comTranco rank 17210 49 Gated 32
mephi.ru mephi.ruTranco rank 17311 59 No 32
revenera.com revenera.comTranco rank 17314 54 No 32
swarthmore.edu swarthmore.eduTranco rank 17354 51 No 1
equibase.com equibase.comTranco rank 17423 37 Gated 32
ina.fr ina.frTranco rank 17476 34 Gated 32
lyricstranslate.com lyricstranslate.comTranco rank 17520 43 Gated 32
icj-cij.org icj-cij.orgTranco rank 17544 48 Gated 1
ust.hk hkust.edu.hkTranco rank 17567 49 No 32
iisd.org iisd.orgTranco rank 17576 39 Gated 32
omnissa.com omnissa.comTranco rank 17615 41 Gated 32
nic.dk punktum.dkTranco rank 17626 57 No 32
wv.gov wv.govTranco rank 17665 29 Gated 1
agrarheute.com agrarheute.comTranco rank 17792 38 Gated 32
linuxjournal.com linuxjournal.comTranco rank 17815 57 No 32
hoststar.ch hoststar.chTranco rank 17862 58 No 32
mein-schoener-garten.de mein-schoener-garten.deTranco rank 17871 61 No 32
edwardjones.com edwardjones.comblockedTranco rank 17879; not measured: HTTP 429 (rate limited) at every rate tried, after 4 attempts — No —
opensource.com opensource.comTranco rank 17895 71 No 24
aviationweek.com aviationweek.comTranco rank 17900 43 No 32
monsido.com acquia.comTranco rank 17938 75 No 32
baccredomatic.com baccredomatic.comTranco rank 17955 57 No 32
jysk.de jysk.deTranco rank 17998 63 No 32
ucas.com ucas.comTranco rank 18060 48 No 32
instyle.de instyle.deTranco rank 18167 63 No 32
wendys.com wendys.comTranco rank 18186 61 No 32
wilsoncenter.org wilsoncenter.orgTranco rank 18223 67 No 32
ironman.com ironman.comblockedTranco rank 18240; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
louisiana.edu louisiana.eduTranco rank 18250 49 Gated 32
lifepointspanel.com lifepointspanel.comTranco rank 18279 56 No 32
postcodebase.com postcodebase.comTranco rank 18294 68 No 32
nwu.ac.za nwu.ac.zaTranco rank 18313 67 No 31
ispsystem.com ispsystem.comTranco rank 18343 55 No 32
msf.org msf.orgTranco rank 18392 70 No 30
cgiar.org cgiar.orgblockedTranco rank 18399; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
hydrawise.com hydrawise.comunreachableTranco rank 18427 — No —
redtailtechnology.com redtailtechnology.comTranco rank 18428 63 No 32
rstudio.com posit.coTranco rank 18450 58 No 32
cftc.gov cftc.govTranco rank 18522 29 Gated 1
euronext.com euronext.comTranco rank 18537 43 No 32
vu.edu.au vu.edu.auTranco rank 18588 54 No 32
aawsat.com aawsat.comTranco rank 18594 47 No 32
healthdata.org healthdata.orgTranco rank 18764 52 Gated 32
asiaone.com asiaone.comunreachableTranco rank 18776 — No —
lassuranceretraite.fr lassuranceretraite.frTranco rank 18795 54 Gated 32
renesas.com renesas.comTranco rank 18982 56 Gated 32
pw.edu.pl pw.edu.plTranco rank 19009 51 Gated 30
al-monitor.com al-monitor.comTranco rank 19105 67 No 32
ksu.edu.sa ksu.edu.saTranco rank 19152 50 Gated 32
au.int au.intTranco rank 19155 60 No 32
padi.com padi.comTranco rank 19184 56 Gated 32
njit.edu njit.eduTranco rank 19258 49 No 32
iii.org iii.orgTranco rank 19373 63 No 3
feedingamerica.org feedingamerica.orgTranco rank 19444 48 No 1
usertesting.com usertesting.comTranco rank 19526 53 No 32
mediamatters.org mediamatters.orgTranco rank 19634 73 No 30
sorbonne-universite.fr sorbonne-universite.frTranco rank 19650 54 No 32
www.gov.za gov.zaTranco rank 19714 43 Gated 32
putovnica.net putovnica.netblockedTranco rank 19716; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
indiebound.org indiebound.orgTranco rank 19733 54 Gated 32
ptd.net ptd.netTranco rank 19750 40 No 1
womenshealth.gov womenshealth.govTranco rank 19751 29 Gated 1
banque-france.fr banque-france.frTranco rank 19786 38 Gated 32
maastrichtuniversity.nl maastrichtuniversity.nlTranco rank 19977 31 Gated 1
orange-business.com orange-business.comTranco rank 19978 65 No 32
kingarthurbaking.com kingarthurbaking.comTranco rank 20102 60 Gated 32
ohio.edu ohio.eduTranco rank 20104 61 Gated 32
cpfl.com.br cpfl.com.brTranco rank 20142 35 Gated 32
civiccomputing.com civicuk.comTranco rank 20198 56 No 32
habitat.org habitat.orgTranco rank 20242 67 No 32
utu.fi utu.fiTranco rank 20303 70 No 32
pea.co.th pea.co.thTranco rank 20321 57 No 32
rmg.co.uk rmg.co.ukunreachableTranco rank 20329 — No —
port.ac.uk port.ac.ukTranco rank 20340 71 No 32
unimo.it unimo.itTranco rank 20429 64 No 32

Scores are for the population, not for ranking two named sites against each other. A few points between neighbors is noise. See what these numbers can and cannot support. Data: sites.csv · checks.csv · summary.json