Sitecore Sites

sitecore-100

The 100 highest-ranked Sitecore sites in the Tranco list. Sitecore does not announce itself, so this is a floor.

Index 12.0 · scanned 2026-10-11 · up to 32 URLs per site · 100 organizations · 85 scanned (85.0% coverage)

Median score 50 across 85 sites
Middle half 41–57 spread around the median
Full range 25–76 lowest to highest
Gated 44 of 85 block AI crawlers outright

Middle of 14 cohorts. All cohorts 50 · best cohort 58.

Where this list came from

The source, and how we filtered it

Source Tranco top sites list, Tranco (Le Pochat et al., NDSS 2019) (2026-09-06)
LicensePublished for research use and redistributable. Each daily list has its own permanent identifier, which is what a citation has to name — 'the Tranco list' on its own is not reproducible.
How we filtered itEvery site in the list, in rank order, had its homepage read once (one request, our declared user agent) and tested by census/sitecore.py for Sitecore. The same response is tested for all three technology cohorts, so a site is read once however many cohorts it might be in, and belongs to at most one: where two technologies match, the stronger evidence wins and the other is named on the row. The position in the cohort is 1..n in Tranco order and nothing is ever reordered by anything of ours. Only medium confidence and above is admitted: one weak signal is a coincidence waiting to be pointed out, and a wrong row is somebody in that community finding a site in our list that is not Sitecore, and being right. Every row carries the signals that decided it, so a disagreement can be about that site rather than about the number. A site is one row per registered domain, taken from where its homepage finally landed, so a company's country domains that redirect to one site are one row, at the best Tranco rank among them. The URL is the root of the landing host.
Instead ofBuiltWith and Wappalyzer datasets, which are licensed, and Sitecore's own customer showcase, which self-selects. Sitecore publishes no customer list.
Built2026-10-11

The filtering is ours and is disclosed as ours. The source published a list; the decision about which rows of it belong in a cohort was a judgment call, and it is written down so somebody can disagree with it.

Distribution

Where the 85 sites land

GradeShare of the cohort SitesShare
Adequate
17 20.0%
Weak
46 54.1%
Not ready
21 24.7%
Strong
1 1.2%
By dimension

What the cohort earns, dimension by dimension

The mean share of each dimension’s available points that this cohort earned. Low here means the whole sector is weak on it, not that one site dragged an average down. The per-site spread is in the dataset.

DimensionMean share earned Mean
#1 · Reach
These parameters determine the fundamental ease of access that AI has to your site information.
69%
#2 · Read
AI generally turns off JavaScript. Does your site information survive without it?
43%
#3 · Understand
Does a machine know who and what you are?
27%
#4 · Act
Sitemaps, redirects, 404s, licensing terms, and not wasting the crawl budget.
59%
How much of each site we read

The cap is 32 URLs and it is a ceiling, not a promise. A portal whose every link points at a different host yields one page; a university yields the full sample. The median here is 32, the range 1–32, published so that "we sampled 32 URLs per site" cannot become a claim the data does not support.

2 sites in this cohort served a certificate we could not verify. They were read anyway and scored normally, because reporting no response for a site every browser loads would describe our TLS stack rather than the site, and each one carries the finding in its row.

Where this cohort fails

14 tests almost nobody in this cohort passes

Universal — nobody passes these 14 checks · 5 of them worth 2 points or more
TestWhat it asks FailingOf Points
ACT-3 If you have a public API, is it described in a standard file?
100.0%
3 2
EXT-11 Have you marked the part of a page that answers a spoken question?
100.0%
85 0
EXT-12 Do you tell search engines the moment a page changes?
100.0%
85 0
EXT-15 Can an AI agent find out how to sign in to your site?
100.0%
3 0
EXT-16 Do you publish a card or a skills list for the agents you run?
100.0%
85 0
EXT-17 Do you list your agents in your domain's DNS records?
100.0%
83 0
EXT-18 Do you tell AI shoppers how they can pay?
100.0%
14 0
EXT-2 Do you list your APIs and agent tools where agents look for them?
100.0%
12 0
EXT-7 If you run real question-and-answer pages, are they marked as such?
100.0%
1 0
PST-2 Have you posted a Content Signals statement about what AI may do with your content?
100.0%
85 0
RED-10 Do you offer a plain-text (Markdown) copy of your pages?
100.0%
64 2
RED-12 If a machine asks for Markdown, does your site give it?
100.0%
85 2
UND-2 Does your site use the page labels that search engines still read for what you publish?
100.0%
9 3
UND-9 If a page is behind a paywall, does it say so?
100.0%
5 2
Near-universal — 95% and above 1 check
TestWhat it asks FailingOf Points
EXT-14 Does your site offer its actions to AI browsers as tools?
98.8%
85 0
Common — 90 to 95% 7 checks · 2 of them worth 2 points or more
TestWhat it asks FailingOf Points
EXT-1 Do you publish an llms.txt file for coding assistants?
94.1%
85 0
EXT-13 Can an assistant ask your site a question directly?
94.1%
85 0
UND-1 Does your site say clearly who you are?
94.1%
85 2
EXT-4 Can an AI assistant connect to your site as a tool?
92.9%
85 0
PST-4 Have you reserved your text and data mining rights in a form machines can read?
92.9%
85 0
RED-5 Do your PDFs and images have their own rules for search and quoting?
92.6%
54 1
UND-6 Are your published and updated dates honest and visible?
91.8%
85 6

Coral bars mark tests worth 2 points or more, the failures that actually move a score.

Every site

Every 100, named, with a report for each

Whether or not it has been scanned. Rows with no website on record, sites that were unreachable and sites that turned us away stay in the table with the reason on them, and none of them enters an average: dropping them would shrink the population to the part that was easy to measure. A few points between two neighbors is noise. The box filters every row in the cohort, not only the page you are on; click a header to sort the rows on this page by name or by score.

Showing 1–100 of 100

SiteScore GatedPages read Report
achmea.nl achmea.nlTranco rank 102 61 No 32
actify.nl zilverenkruis.nlTranco rank 103 46 No 32
huawei.com huawei.comTranco rank 422 45 No 32
uchicago.edu uchicago.eduTranco rank 1966 28 Gated 1
aboutcookies.org aboutcookies.orgTranco rank 2153 71 No 10
adp.com adp.comTranco rank 2349 60 Gated 32
lastpass.com lastpass.comTranco rank 2524 46 Gated 32
hinet.net cht.com.twTranco rank 2878 49 No 32
mimecast.com mimecast.comTranco rank 3424 34 Gated 1
carnival.com carnival.comTranco rank 4484 43 Gated 1
softbank.jp softbank.jpTranco rank 4849 50 No 1
coveo.com coveo.comTranco rank 5013 51 No 1
stlouisfed.org stlouisfed.orgTranco rank 5202 49 Gated 32
gotomeeting.com goto.comTranco rank 5443 29 Gated 1
health.mil health.milTranco rank 5732 29 Gated 1
avid.com avid.comblockedTranco rank 5742; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
ricoh.com ricoh.comTranco rank 6110 67 No 32
azcentral.com azcentral.comTranco rank 6118 34 Gated 32
freep.com freep.comTranco rank 6380 34 Gated 32
logmein.com logmein.comTranco rank 6446 48 Gated 32
msdmanuals.com msdmanuals.comTranco rank 6490 68 No 32
csiro.au csiro.auTranco rank 6662 52 Gated 12
hkjc.com hkjc.comTranco rank 6987 29 Gated 1
nfpa.org nfpa.orgTranco rank 7192 50 No 32
liu.se liu.seunreachableTranco rank 7455 — No —
cbre.com cbre.comblockedTranco rank 7770; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
ksyun.com ksyun.comTranco rank 7911 57 No 1
uwa.edu.au uwa.edu.auTranco rank 7984 51 Gated 32
hsbc.com hsbc.comTranco rank 8823 76 No 32
tvsmotor.com tvsmotor.comTranco rank 9259 46 No 32
dignitymemorial.com dignitymemorial.comblockedTranco rank 9260; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
ktrmr.com kantar.comTranco rank 9504 43 No 32
arm.com arm.comTranco rank 9570 38 No 1
ada.org ada.orgTranco rank 10557 61 No 32
aramco.com aramco.comTranco rank 11203 51 Gated 31
drexel.edu drexel.eduTranco rank 11354 57 No 32
fronius.com fronius.comTranco rank 11420 36 Gated 30
ovid.com ovid.comTranco rank 11524 44 Gated 1
dtu.dk dtu.dkTranco rank 11579 52 Gated 32
vietjetair.com vietjetair.comblockedTranco rank 11747; not measured: HTTP 403 — No —
bankofengland.co.uk bankofengland.co.ukTranco rank 11820 62 Gated 32
brother.co.jp brother.co.jpTranco rank 12002 51 No 32
tower.jp tower.jpTranco rank 12111 41 Gated 32
publix.com publix.comTranco rank 12389 52 No 32
acog.org acog.orgTranco rank 12765 57 No 23
gatesfoundation.org gatesfoundation.orgTranco rank 12781 74 No 31
indystar.com indystar.comTranco rank 13094 35 Gated 32
aon.com aon.comTranco rank 13265 50 Gated 32
depaul.edu depaul.eduTranco rank 13378 58 No 32
airarabia.com airarabia.comTranco rank 13531 34 Gated 1
smu.edu smu.eduTranco rank 13547 64 No 32
pepsico.com pepsico.comblockedTranco rank 13633; not measured: HTTP 403 (Imperva) — No —
fisglobal.com fisglobal.comblockedTranco rank 13743; not measured: HTTP 403 (Akamai) — No —
jabra.com jabra.comTranco rank 13846 34 Gated 1
moneris.com moneris.comblockedTranco rank 14041; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
bhf.org.uk bhf.org.ukTranco rank 14354 61 No 32
loreal.com loreal.comblockedTranco rank 14431; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
upmc.com upmc.comTranco rank 14757 53 Gated 32
exxonmobil.com corporate.exxonmobil.comTranco rank 15075 72 No 32
adecco.com adecco.comTranco rank 15090 53 No 32
desmoinesregister.com desmoinesregister.comTranco rank 15279 25 Gated 32
slb.com slb.comTranco rank 15396 56 Gated 32
iqvia.com iqvia.comTranco rank 15400 64 No 32
is.co.za services.global.nttTranco rank 15599 56 No 1
outsystemsenterprise.com outsystems.comblockedTranco rank 15629; not measured: HTTP 403 — No —
healio.com healio.comTranco rank 15653 53 Gated 32
amgen.com amgen.comTranco rank 15679 48 No 1
abbyy.com abbyy.comTranco rank 15774 34 Gated 30
thefa.com thefa.comTranco rank 15928 43 Gated 32
shangri-la.com shangri-la.comTranco rank 16159 42 Gated 32
wacom.com wacom.comTranco rank 16241 48 Gated 32
business.gov.au business.gov.auTranco rank 16404 59 Gated 32
polyu.edu.hk polyu.edu.hkunreachableTranco rank 16450 — No —
gotomypc.com get.gotomypc.comTranco rank 16669 29 Gated 1
rsna.org rsna.orgTranco rank 16802 60 No 32
patheos.com patheos.comblockedTranco rank 16809; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
bcbsla.com lablue.comTranco rank 16842 51 No 32
essex.ac.uk essex.ac.ukTranco rank 16946 41 Gated 32
infor.com infor.comblockedTranco rank 17069; not measured: HTTP 403 (CloudFront) — No —
vietcombank.com.vn vietcombank.com.vnTranco rank 17072 33 Gated 32
northjersey.com northjersey.comTranco rank 17094 35 Gated 32
resideo.com resideo.comTranco rank 17174 34 Gated 1
providence.org providence.orgTranco rank 17215 46 No 23
uidaho.edu uidaho.eduTranco rank 17368 68 No 32
nwf.org nwf.orgTranco rank 17501 49 No 32
uta.edu uta.eduTranco rank 17818 28 Gated 1
pewtrusts.org pew.orgTranco rank 17885 28 Gated 1
emiratesnbd.com emiratesnbd.comblockedTranco rank 18053; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
3shape.com 3shape.comTranco rank 18204 62 No 32
mandarinoriental.com mandarinoriental.comTranco rank 18293 60 No 32
isaca.org isaca.orgTranco rank 18619 50 Gated 32
cirquedusoleil.com cirquedusoleil.comTranco rank 18832 50 No 1
eatright.org eatright.orgTranco rank 18908 34 Gated 1
piraeusbank.gr piraeusbank.grTranco rank 18931 49 Gated 32
xfinityhome.com xfinity.comblockedTranco rank 18976; not measured: HTTP 403 — No —
nttdata.com nttdata.comTranco rank 18997 53 No 32
seismic.com seismic.comTranco rank 19131 64 No 32
acc.org acc.orgTranco rank 19180 51 Gated 32
royalcanin.com royalcanin.comTranco rank 19185 56 No 32
commufa.jp commufa.jpTranco rank 19699 59 No 32

Scores are for the population, not for ranking two named sites against each other. A few points between neighbors is noise. See what these numbers can and cannot support. Data: sites.csv · checks.csv · summary.json