England's Multi-Academy Trusts

Search every site in this cohort

uk-academy-trusts

Every open multi-academy trust in England, the bodies that run most of its state schools.

Index 12.1 · scanned 2026-11-02 · up to 32 URLs per site · 1203 organizations · 258 scanned (21.4% coverage) · 899 with no published URL · scored as k12-education

Median score 56 across 258 sites
Middle half 50–60 spread around the median
Full range 31–74 lowest to highest
Gated 62 of 258 block AI crawlers outright

Middle of 31 cohorts. All cohorts 54 · best cohort 63.

Where this list came from

The source, and how we filtered it

Source Get Information About Schools: academy trusts and academy membership, Department for Education (2026-11-02 (allgroupsdata20261102.csv, academiesmatmembership20261102.csv))
LicenseOpen Government Licence v3.0. Wikidata is CC0.
Cite asContains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we filtered itGroups with Group Type 'Multi-academy trust' and Group Status 'Open', kept when at least 2 academies with status Open or 'Open, but proposed to close' belong to them in the membership file (1,203 of 1,317). source_id is the GIAS group id (TR…). GIAS records no trust website, so the website is Wikidata P856 on the item carrying the trust's Companies House number (P2622), used only when one host answers. Nothing is taken from member schools' websites.
Instead ofA trust's website taken from its schools' websites, which would be a guess.
Built2026-11-02

The filtering is ours and is disclosed as ours. The source published a list; the decision about which rows of it belong in a cohort was a judgment call, and it is written down so somebody can disagree with it.

Distribution

Where the 258 sites land

GradeShare of the cohort SitesShare
Adequate
76 29.5%
Weak
172 66.7%
Not ready
10 3.9%
By dimension

What the cohort earns, dimension by dimension

The mean share of each dimension’s available points that this cohort earned. Low here means the whole sector is weak on it, not that one site dragged an average down. The per-site spread is in the dataset.

DimensionMean share earned Mean
#1 · Reach
These parameters determine the fundamental ease of access that AI has to your site information.
80%
#2 · Read
AI generally turns off JavaScript. Does your site information survive without it?
55%
#3 · Understand
Does a machine know who and what you are?
27%
#4 · Act
Sitemaps, redirects, 404s, licensing terms, and not wasting the crawl budget.
51%
How much of each site we read

The cap is 32 URLs and it is a ceiling, not a promise. A portal whose every link points at a different host yields one page; a university yields the full sample. The median here is 32, the range 1–32, published so that "we sampled 32 URLs per site" cannot become a claim the data does not support.

3 sites in this cohort served a certificate we could not verify. They were read anyway and scored normally, because reporting no response for a site every browser loads would describe our TLS stack rather than the site, and each one carries the finding in its row.

Where this cohort fails

10 tests almost nobody in this cohort passes

Universal — nobody passes these 10 checks · 2 of them worth 2 points or more
TestWhat it asks FailingOf Points
EXT-11 Have you marked the part of a page that answers a spoken question?
100.0%
258 0
EXT-12 Do you tell search engines the moment a page changes?
100.0%
258 0
EXT-14 Does your site offer its actions to AI browsers as tools?
100.0%
253 0
EXT-16 Do you publish a card or a skills list for the agents you run?
100.0%
258 0
EXT-17 Do you list your agents in your domain's DNS records?
100.0%
257 0
EXT-18 Do you tell AI shoppers how they can pay?
100.0%
2 0
EXT-2 Do you list your APIs and agent tools where agents look for them?
100.0%
18 0
EXT-7 If you run real question-and-answer pages, are they marked as such?
100.0%
5 0
RED-10 Do you offer a plain-text (Markdown) copy of your pages?
100.0%
231 2
RED-12 If a machine asks for Markdown, does your site give it?
100.0%
258 2
Near-universal — 95% and above 5 checks · 2 of them worth 2 points or more
TestWhat it asks FailingOf Points
UND-1 Does your site say clearly who you are?
99.2%
258 2
PST-2 Have you posted a Content Signals statement about what AI may do with your content?
98.8%
258 0
UND-5 Does the author label in your page code point to that person?
97.8%
229 1
UND-2 Does your site use the page labels that search engines still read for what you publish?
97.3%
258 3
EXT-1 Do you publish an llms.txt file for coding assistants?
96.9%
258 0
Common — 90 to 95% 4 checks · 1 of them worth 2 points or more
TestWhat it asks FailingOf Points
EXT-13 Can an assistant ask your site a question directly?
93.0%
258 0
PST-4 Have you reserved your text and data mining rights in a form machines can read?
93.0%
258 0
EXT-4 Can an AI assistant connect to your site as a tool?
92.6%
258 0
UND-10 Does your page code link to your official profiles elsewhere?
92.2%
258 2

Coral bars mark tests worth 2 points or more, the failures that actually move a score.

Every site

Every 1,203, named, with a report for each

Whether or not it has been scanned. Rows with no website on record, sites that were unreachable and sites that turned us away stay in the table with the reason on them, and none of them enters an average: dropping them would shrink the population to the part that was easy to measure. A few points between two neighbors is noise. The box filters every row in the cohort, not only the page you are on; click a header to sort the rows on this page by name or by score.

Showing 1,201–1,203 of 1,203 · page 13 of 13

SiteScore GatedPages read Report
Yorkshire Learning Trust web.starmat.ukregister id TR03845; address from Wikidata P856 (Companies House number) (low confidence), not checked by loading it 58 No 1
Youth Engagement Schools Trust no website on recordregister id TR03251; GIAS records no website for a trust, and Wikidata has none on its Companies House number or exact name — No —
Zenith Multi Academy Trust no website on recordregister id TR01255; GIAS records no website for a trust, and Wikidata has none on its Companies House number or exact name — No —

Scores are for the population, not for ranking two named sites against each other. A few points between neighbors is noise. See what these numbers can and cannot support. Headline figures: summary.json (CC BY 4.0). The site-by-site data on this page is licensed; a bulk copy is from TEN7 for a fee.