US B2B Software Companies

Search every site in this cohort

b2b-software

US business-to-business software companies with 100 or more employees, as Scott King's October 2026 AI crawler access study selected them.

Index 12.1 · scanned 2026-10-30 · up to 32 URLs per site · 3925 organizations · 3053 scanned (77.8% coverage) · scored as saas

Median score 59 across 3053 sites
Middle half 52–65 spread around the median
Full range 18–83 lowest to highest
Gated 755 of 3053 block AI crawlers outright

Middle of 16 cohorts. All cohorts 53 · best cohort 60.

Where this list came from

The source, and how we filtered it

Source Website AI Visibility Data, 2026-10 AI crawler access study, companies.csv (commit 8216276), Scott King (thescottking.com) (2026-10-30)
LicenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), which permits adapting and republishing the list under this census's CC BY-SA 4.0 with credit to Scott King, thescottking.com, a link to the license, and a note of what was changed. What was changed is in the method.
Cite asScott King, “What AI search engines actually see on 3,877 B2B software websites,” thescottking.com, 30 October 2026, https://thescottking.com/what-ai-search-engines-see-b2b-software-websites; company list from github.com/thescottking/website-ai-visibility-data, CC BY 4.0.
How we filtered itEvery row of the published list, 3,925 B2B software and services companies, which the study selected as US companies of 100 or more employees that a commercial company database (Apollo) classes under SIC 7372, prepackaged software; 125 rows carry other codes instead. We take the company name and the domain the study measured, scanned at its root over https, nothing else: the industry codes, founding year, location and LinkedIn page are the database's and are not republished in the cohort. Where two companies share a name, the domain is added to tell them apart. Where the study's address was a page within a larger company's site (two rows), the root is scanned, which is what the study measured, and the row says so. Rows are in the study's alphabetical order and carry no rank. Every row declares the SaaS vertical, because the study selected for software. The roster is census/sources/us-b2b-software.json, made from the study's CSV at the cited commit by scripts/prepare-b2b-software-roster, which refuses a file whose SHA-256 is not the pinned one.
Instead ofA list of software companies bought from a data vendor, which could not be relicensed, and the SEC's listed companies alone, which leave out the private companies that make up most of B2B software.
Built2026-10-30

The filtering is ours and is disclosed as ours. The source published a list; the decision about which rows of it belong in a cohort was a judgment call, and it is written down so somebody can disagree with it.

Distribution

Where the 3053 sites land

GradeShare of the cohort SitesShare
Adequate
1401 45.9%
Weak
1313 43.0%
Not ready
270 8.8%
Strong
69 2.3%
By dimension

What the cohort earns, dimension by dimension

The mean share of each dimension’s available points that this cohort earned. Low here means the whole sector is weak on it, not that one site dragged an average down. The per-site spread is in the dataset.

DimensionMean share earned Mean
#1 · Reach
These parameters determine the fundamental ease of access that AI has to your site information.
80%
#2 · Read
AI generally turns off JavaScript. Does your site information survive without it?
56%
#3 · Understand
Does a machine know who and what you are?
34%
#4 · Act
Sitemaps, redirects, 404s, licensing terms, and not wasting the crawl budget.
55%
How much of each site we read

The cap is 32 URLs and it is a ceiling, not a promise. A portal whose every link points at a different host yields one page; a university yields the full sample. The median here is 32, the range 1–32, published so that "we sampled 32 URLs per site" cannot become a claim the data does not support.

57 sites in this cohort served a certificate we could not verify. They were read anyway and scored normally, because reporting no response for a site every browser loads would describe our TLS stack rather than the site, and each one carries the finding in its row.

Where this cohort fails

3 tests almost nobody in this cohort passes

Universal — nobody passes these 3 checks
TestWhat it asks FailingOf Points
EXT-12 Do you tell search engines the moment a page changes?
100.0%
3053 0
EXT-17 Do you list your agents in your domain's DNS records?
100.0%
3021 0
EXT-7 If you run real question-and-answer pages, are they marked as such?
100.0%
86 0
Near-universal — 95% and above 6 checks · 1 of them worth 2 points or more
TestWhat it asks FailingOf Points
EXT-16 Do you publish a card or a skills list for the agents you run?
98.8%
3053 0
EXT-11 Have you marked the part of a page that answers a spoken question?
98.7%
3053 0
EXT-18 Do you tell AI shoppers how they can pay?
98.7%
823 0
RED-10 Do you offer a plain-text (Markdown) copy of your pages?
97.5%
2561 2
EXT-14 Does your site offer its actions to AI browsers as tools?
97.3%
2858 0
PST-2 Have you posted a Content Signals statement about what AI may do with your content?
95.7%
3053 0
Common — 90 to 95% 3 checks · 1 of them worth 2 points or more
TestWhat it asks FailingOf Points
EXT-13 Can an assistant ask your site a question directly?
91.8%
3053 0
PST-4 Have you reserved your text and data mining rights in a form machines can read?
91.8%
3053 0
RED-12 If a machine asks for Markdown, does your site give it?
90.4%
3040 2

Coral bars mark tests worth 2 points or more, the failures that actually move a score.

Every site

Every 3,925, named, with a report for each

Whether or not it has been scanned. Rows with no website on record, sites that were unreachable and sites that turned us away stay in the table with the reason on them, and none of them enters an average: dropping them would shrink the population to the part that was easy to measure. A few points between two neighbors is noise. The box filters every row in the cohort, not only the page you are on; click a header to sort the rows on this page by name or by score.

Showing 2,001–2,100 of 3,925 · page 21 of 40

SiteScore GatedPages read Report
LMKR lmkr.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 48 No 32
LOCAL GOVERNMENT CORPORATION lgc-tn.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 73 No 32
LOCALACT localact.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 61 No 32
Locally locally.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 55 Gated 32
Locus Technologies locustec.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 61 Gated 32
Lofty lofty.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 61 Gated 32
Logile, Inc. logile.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 61 No 32
LogiNext loginextsolutions.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 67 No 32
Logisoft Technologies Inc. logisofttechinc.comunreachablelisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study — No —
LogMeIn logmein.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 48 Gated 32
Logos logos.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 60 No 32
LogRocket logrocket.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 76 No 32
Lojistic lojistic.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 60 No 27
Lokalise lokalise.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 63 No 32
Looker looker.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 60 No 1
Loop Subscriptions loopwork.colisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 58 No 32
Lorikeet lorikeetcx.ailisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 66 No 32
Lotame lotame.comblockedlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
LottieFiles lottiefiles.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 61 No 32
Lotus Development lotus.comblockedlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study; not measured: HTTP 403 (CloudFront) — No —
Lotus Interworks lotusinterworks.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 61 No 1
LotusFlare lotusflare.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 60 No 32
LOWCODEMINDS lowcodeminds.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 57 Gated 32
Lower lower.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 63 No 32
Loyal loyalhealth.comblockedlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
Loyalty Methods loyaltymethods.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 79 No 32
LTi Technology Solutions ltisolutions.comblockedlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
Lucidity lucidity.cloudlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 69 No 32
LUIPOS luipos.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 59 No 28
Luma lumalabs.ailisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 46 Gated 32
Luma Health lumahealth.iolisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 63 No 32
Lumafield lumafield.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 52 No 32
Lumber lumberfi.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 59 No 32
Lumel lumel.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 61 Gated 31
Lumin Digital lumindigital.comblockedlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
Lumivero lumivero.comblockedlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
Lumos lumos.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 65 No 32
Lumu Technologies lumu.iolisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 55 Gated 32
Luna Park narvii.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 65 No 32
Lundsholt Dohme LTD htsol.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 33 Gated 1
Lunit Cancer Screening lunit.iolisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 46 No 32
Luxor Technology luxor.techlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 67 No 32
LXRGuide lxrguide.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 32 Gated 14
Lynx (lynx-fh.com) lynx-fh.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 65 No 32
Lynx (lynx.com) lynx.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 67 No 32
Lyric lyric.techlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 59 No 32
Lyric.ai lyric.ailisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 61 No 32
Lyris lyris.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 33 Gated 1
LYT lyt.ailisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 64 No 32
LYTIKA lytika.colisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 33 Gated 1
Lytx Inc lytx.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 51 Gated 32
Lyzr AI lyzr.ailisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 64 No 32
MA One oneindependenceway.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 45 Gated 5
Mable meetmable.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 34 Gated 1
MACC (Mid America Computer Corporation) maccnet.comunreachablelisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study — No —
Mach7 Technologies mach7t.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 66 No 32
MacPaw 🇺🇦 macpaw.comunreachablelisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study — No —
Macro Helix macrohelix.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 60 No 22
MacroHealth macrohealth.comblockedlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
Mad Mobile Inc madmobile.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 52 No 14
MadCap Software, Inc. madcapsoftware.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 57 Gated 31
Made4net made4net.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 59 Gated 32
Madhive madhive.comunreachablelisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study — No —
Madison Logic madisonlogic.comblockedlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
Maestra.io maestra.iolisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 71 No 32
Magic Software Americas magicamericas.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 63 No 32
Magic Software Enterprises magicsoftware.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 50 No 1
Magnifi magnifi.ailisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 59 No 32
MahiGaming mahigaming.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 63 No 4
Maino.ai maino.ailisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 76 No 32
Maintain IQ, Inc. maintainiq.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 72 No 32
MaintainX getmaintainx.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 63 No 32
Maintenance Connection maintenanceconnection.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 61 No 1
Majesco majesco.comblockedlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
MAK Technologies mak.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 60 No 32
Malbek malbek.ioblockedlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
Malou malou.iolisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 60 No 32
Management Controls Inc. managementcontrols.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 62 No 32
Mapbox Inc mapbox.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 55 No 32
MapLarge maplarge.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 56 No 32
Mappa mappa.ailisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 73 No 32
MAQ Software maqsoftware.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 70 No 32
Marchex marchex.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 67 No 32
MarginEdge marginedge.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 52 No 32
Marigold meetmarigold.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 53 No 32
Marin Software marinsoftware.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 58 No 32
Mark43 mark43.comblockedlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
Marketing Technology Solutions qualityhealth.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 56 No 1
Marketron marketron.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 57 No 32
Marquis Software Development, Inc. marquisware.comblockedlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
MarqVision marqvision.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 66 No 32
Marsh ClearSight marshclearsight.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 31 Gated 1
Martin and Co CPAs martinandco.colisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 33 Gated 1
Marvel Technologies Inc marveltechus.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 53 Gated 32
Mashgin mashgin.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 67 No 32
mason getmason.iolisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 56 No 2
Masonry masonryhq.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 33 Gated 1
Mastercam mastercam.comblockedlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
MATLAB mathworks.comblockedlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study; not measured: HTTP 403 (Akamai) — No —
Matrack Inc. matrackinc.comlisted in Scott King's 2026-10 AI crawler access study 55 Gated 32

Scores are for the population, not for ranking two named sites against each other. A few points between neighbors is noise. See what these numbers can and cannot support. Data: sites.csv · checks.csv · summary.json