WordPress Sites

wordpress-500

The 500 highest-ranked WordPress sites in the Tranco list.

Index 12.0 · scanned 2026-10-11 · up to 32 URLs per site · 500 organizations · 423 scanned (84.6% coverage)

Median score 58 across 423 sites
Middle half 50–64 spread around the median
Full range 28–79 lowest to highest
Gated 161 of 423 block AI crawlers outright

Strongest of the 14 cohorts. All cohorts 50 · best cohort 58.

Where this list came from

The source, and how we filtered it

Source Tranco top sites list, Tranco (Le Pochat et al., NDSS 2019) (2026-09-06)
LicensePublished for research use and redistributable. Each daily list has its own permanent identifier, which is what a citation has to name — 'the Tranco list' on its own is not reproducible.
How we filtered itEvery site in the list, in rank order, had its homepage read once (one request, our declared user agent) and tested by census/wordpress.py for WordPress. The same response is tested for all three technology cohorts, so a site is read once however many cohorts it might be in, and belongs to at most one: where two technologies match, the stronger evidence wins and the other is named on the row. The position in the cohort is 1..n in Tranco order and nothing is ever reordered by anything of ours. Only medium confidence and above is admitted: one weak signal is a coincidence waiting to be pointed out, and a wrong row is somebody in that community finding a site in our list that is not WordPress, and being right. Every row carries the signals that decided it, so a disagreement can be about that site rather than about the number. A site is one row per registered domain, taken from where its homepage finally landed, so a company's country domains that redirect to one site are one row, at the best Tranco rank among them. The URL is the root of the landing host.
Instead ofBuiltWith and Wappalyzer datasets, which are licensed. Also WordPress.org's own showcase, which self-selects toward flattering examples and cannot be the base of a survey.
Built2026-10-11

The filtering is ours and is disclosed as ours. The source published a list; the decision about which rows of it belong in a cohort was a judgment call, and it is written down so somebody can disagree with it.

Distribution

Where the 423 sites land

GradeShare of the cohort SitesShare
Adequate
180 42.6%
Strong
10 2.4%
Weak
202 47.8%
Not ready
31 7.3%
By dimension

What the cohort earns, dimension by dimension

The mean share of each dimension’s available points that this cohort earned. Low here means the whole sector is weak on it, not that one site dragged an average down. The per-site spread is in the dataset.

DimensionMean share earned Mean
#1 · Reach
These parameters determine the fundamental ease of access that AI has to your site information.
72%
#2 · Read
AI generally turns off JavaScript. Does your site information survive without it?
53%
#3 · Understand
Does a machine know who and what you are?
40%
#4 · Act
Sitemaps, redirects, 404s, licensing terms, and not wasting the crawl budget.
63%
How much of each site we read

The cap is 32 URLs and it is a ceiling, not a promise. A portal whose every link points at a different host yields one page; a university yields the full sample. The median here is 32, the range 1–32, published so that "we sampled 32 URLs per site" cannot become a claim the data does not support.

7 sites in this cohort served a certificate we could not verify. They were read anyway and scored normally, because reporting no response for a site every browser loads would describe our TLS stack rather than the site, and each one carries the finding in its row.

Where this cohort fails

4 tests almost nobody in this cohort passes

Universal — nobody passes these 4 checks · 1 of them worth 2 points or more
TestWhat it asks FailingOf Points
EXT-12 Do you tell search engines the moment a page changes?
100.0%
423 0
EXT-17 Do you list your agents in your domain's DNS records?
100.0%
408 0
EXT-7 If you run real question-and-answer pages, are they marked as such?
100.0%
19 0
UND-2 Does your site use the page labels that search engines still read for what you publish?
100.0%
16 3
Near-universal — 95% and above 7 checks · 1 of them worth 2 points or more
TestWhat it asks FailingOf Points
RED-5 Do your PDFs and images have their own rules for search and quoting?
99.2%
376 1
EXT-16 Do you publish a card or a skills list for the agents you run?
98.8%
423 0
EXT-11 Have you marked the part of a page that answers a spoken question?
98.6%
423 0
EXT-18 Do you tell AI shoppers how they can pay?
98.5%
68 0
RED-10 Do you offer a plain-text (Markdown) copy of your pages?
98.4%
377 2
EXT-14 Does your site offer its actions to AI browsers as tools?
96.9%
417 0
PST-2 Have you posted a Content Signals statement about what AI may do with your content?
96.7%
423 0
Common — 90 to 95% 4 checks · 1 of them worth 2 points or more
TestWhat it asks FailingOf Points
RED-12 If a machine asks for Markdown, does your site give it?
94.6%
423 2
EXT-13 Can an assistant ask your site a question directly?
94.3%
423 0
PST-4 Have you reserved your text and data mining rights in a form machines can read?
92.9%
423 0
EXT-4 Can an AI assistant connect to your site as a tool?
92.7%
423 0

Coral bars mark tests worth 2 points or more, the failures that actually move a score.

Every site

Every 500, named, with a report for each

Whether or not it has been scanned. Rows with no website on record, sites that were unreachable and sites that turned us away stay in the table with the reason on them, and none of them enters an average: dropping them would shrink the population to the part that was easy to measure. A few points between two neighbors is noise. The box filters every row in the cohort, not only the page you are on; click a header to sort the rows on this page by name or by score.

Showing 101–200 of 500 · page 2 of 5

SiteScore GatedPages read Report
arstechnica.com arstechnica.comblockedTranco rank 1940; not measured: HTTP 403 — No —
zdnet.com zdnet.comTranco rank 1943 40 Gated 32
themeisle.com themeisle.comTranco rank 2006 65 No 32
moengage.com moengage.comTranco rank 2019 53 Gated 32
ninjarmm.com ninjaone.comTranco rank 2036 56 Gated 32
smilewanted.com smilewanted.comTranco rank 2075 60 Gated 32
automattic.com automattic.comunreachableTranco rank 2090 — No —
gizmodo.com gizmodo.comTranco rank 2092 77 No 32
intentiq.com intentiq.comTranco rank 2101 59 Gated 32
datto.com datto.comTranco rank 2130 65 No 32
primis.tech primis.techTranco rank 2135 56 Gated 32
thesun.co.uk thesun.co.ukTranco rank 2139 55 Gated 1
aniview.com aniview.comTranco rank 2142 69 No 32
sonobi.com sonobi.comTranco rank 2147 50 No 1
fyber.com digitalturbine.comTranco rank 2159 64 No 32
unc.edu unc.eduTranco rank 2176 71 No 32
engadget.com engadget.comTranco rank 2185 54 No 32
ufl.edu ufl.eduTranco rank 2188 63 No 32
trustedstack.com trustedstack.comTranco rank 2197 60 Gated 10
adthrive.com raptive.comTranco rank 2209 56 Gated 31
variety.com variety.comTranco rank 2211 41 Gated 32
sharethis.com sharethis.comTranco rank 2238 65 No 32
duke.edu duke.eduTranco rank 2250; also showed signs of Drupal; the stronger evidence decided 57 No 32
generatepress.com generatepress.comTranco rank 2261 72 No 32
uiuc.edu illinois.eduTranco rank 2264 48 Gated 32
umbrella.com umbrella.cisco.comTranco rank 2265 74 No 32
useinsider.com insiderone.comTranco rank 2276 51 Gated 32
cookiebot.com cookiebot.comTranco rank 2282 64 No 32
vox.com vox.comTranco rank 2287 48 Gated 32
bazaarvoice.com bazaarvoice.comTranco rank 2304 71 No 32
adswizz.com adswizz.comTranco rank 2309 61 Gated 32
purdue.edu purdue.eduTranco rank 2318 48 Gated 32
unruly.co nexxen.comTranco rank 2337 65 No 32
websupport.sk websupport.skTranco rank 2359 52 Gated 32
nielsen.com nielsen.comTranco rank 2365 55 No 32
chartboost.com loopme.aiTranco rank 2378 60 No 32
wpengine.com wpengine.comTranco rank 2395 52 Gated 32
tappx.com tappx.comblockedTranco rank 2397; not measured: HTTP 403 — No —
inmotionhosting.com inmotionhosting.comblockedTranco rank 2402; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
traffmonetizer.com traffmonetizer.comTranco rank 2413 29 Gated 1
rollingstone.com rollingstone.comTranco rank 2431 45 Gated 32
usc.edu usc.eduTranco rank 2439 63 No 32
yotpo.com yotpo.comTranco rank 2462 55 No 32
moodle.com moodle.comblockedTranco rank 2469; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
urbanairship.com airship.comTranco rank 2487 74 No 32
x5.ru x5.ruTranco rank 2492 57 No 32
entrepreneur.com entrepreneur.comTranco rank 2493 63 Gated 32
trustindex.io trustindex.ioTranco rank 2503 57 No 32
mojohost.com mojohost.comTranco rank 2506 49 Gated 32
surfshark.com surfshark.comTranco rank 2535 58 No 32
hollywoodreporter.com hollywoodreporter.comTranco rank 2542 60 No 1
ssl.com ssl.comTranco rank 2548 72 No 32
churnzero.net churnzero.comblockedTranco rank 2552; not measured: HTTP 403 — No —
nextdoor.com nextdoor.comTranco rank 2560 42 Gated 1
technologyreview.com technologyreview.comTranco rank 2586 46 No 8
tizen.org tizen.orgblockedTranco rank 2632; also showed signs of Drupal; the stronger evidence decided; not measured: HTTP 403 (CloudFront) — No —
matomo.org matomo.orgTranco rank 2638 57 Gated 32
woocommerce.com woocommerce.comTranco rank 2639 63 No 32
protectmyapp.com protectmyapp.comTranco rank 2649 65 No 32
brightspace.com d2l.comTranco rank 2665 61 Gated 32
cpi.ad.jp cpi.ad.jpTranco rank 2683 61 No 32
riskified.com riskified.comblockedTranco rank 2699; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
vtex.com vtex.comTranco rank 2776 63 No 32
pubnative.net verve.comTranco rank 2817 79 No 32
utah.edu utah.eduTranco rank 2822 55 Gated 32
ventraip.net.au ventraip.com.auTranco rank 2824 56 No 32
sportradar.com sportradar.comTranco rank 2837 59 Gated 32
kochava.com kochava.comTranco rank 2842 50 No 1
tamu.edu tamu.eduTranco rank 2852 63 No 32
libsyn.com libsyn.comTranco rank 2887 54 No 32
senderscore.com senderscore.orgTranco rank 2910 58 No 32
cern.ch home.cernTranco rank 2942 60 No 1
hellotalk8.com hellotalk8.comTranco rank 3049 52 Gated 21
kbz0pwvxmv.com kbz0pwvxmv.comTranco rank 3110 39 No 1
brevo.com brevo.comTranco rank 3126 49 No 32
su89-cdn.net su89-cdn.netTranco rank 3138 39 No 1
mountain.com mountain.comTranco rank 3150 64 No 32
walkme.com walkme.comTranco rank 3177 48 No 1
admatic.de admatic.deTranco rank 3178 54 Gated 32
geeksforgeeks.org geeksforgeeks.orgTranco rank 3181 71 No 32
brookings.edu brookings.eduTranco rank 3191 36 Gated 32
the-ozone-project.com ozoneproject.comTranco rank 3231 61 Gated 32
alchemer.com alchemer.comblockedTranco rank 3257; not measured: HTTP 403 — No —
mediavine.com mediavine.comTranco rank 3278 65 No 32
ispot.tv ispot.tvTranco rank 3282 63 No 32
x-cdn-static.com x-cdn-static.comTranco rank 3290 48 No 1
iterable.com iterable.comTranco rank 3339 62 No 32
chartbeat.com chartbeat.comTranco rank 3353 49 No 32
c6gj-static.net c6gj-static.netTranco rank 3381 30 Gated 1
yg5sjx5kzy.com yg5sjx5kzy.comTranco rank 3402 48 No 1
ouraring.com ouraring.comTranco rank 3414 76 No 32
com.com gen.xyzblockedTranco rank 3418; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
wustl.edu washu.eduTranco rank 3445 58 No 32
nobelprize.org nobelprize.orgTranco rank 3454 58 Gated 32
dictionary.com dictionary.comTranco rank 3456 39 Gated 32
ipcc.ch ipcc.chTranco rank 3471 43 Gated 32
jumpcloud.com jumpcloud.comTranco rank 3480 54 Gated 32
undertone.com perion.comblockedTranco rank 3522; not measured: HTTP 403 — No —
mariadb.org mariadb.orgTranco rank 3530 65 No 32
colorlib.com colorlib.comTranco rank 3607 71 No 32

Scores are for the population, not for ranking two named sites against each other. A few points between neighbors is noise. See what these numbers can and cannot support. Data: sites.csv · checks.csv · summary.json