WordPress Sites

wordpress-500

The 500 highest-ranked WordPress sites in the Tranco list.

Index 12.0 · scanned 2026-10-11 · up to 32 URLs per site · 500 organizations · 423 scanned (84.6% coverage)

Median score 58 across 423 sites
Middle half 50–64 spread around the median
Full range 28–79 lowest to highest
Gated 161 of 423 block AI crawlers outright

Strongest of the 14 cohorts. All cohorts 50 · best cohort 58.

Where this list came from

The source, and how we filtered it

Source Tranco top sites list, Tranco (Le Pochat et al., NDSS 2019) (2026-09-06)
LicensePublished for research use and redistributable. Each daily list has its own permanent identifier, which is what a citation has to name — 'the Tranco list' on its own is not reproducible.
How we filtered itEvery site in the list, in rank order, had its homepage read once (one request, our declared user agent) and tested by census/wordpress.py for WordPress. The same response is tested for all three technology cohorts, so a site is read once however many cohorts it might be in, and belongs to at most one: where two technologies match, the stronger evidence wins and the other is named on the row. The position in the cohort is 1..n in Tranco order and nothing is ever reordered by anything of ours. Only medium confidence and above is admitted: one weak signal is a coincidence waiting to be pointed out, and a wrong row is somebody in that community finding a site in our list that is not WordPress, and being right. Every row carries the signals that decided it, so a disagreement can be about that site rather than about the number. A site is one row per registered domain, taken from where its homepage finally landed, so a company's country domains that redirect to one site are one row, at the best Tranco rank among them. The URL is the root of the landing host.
Instead ofBuiltWith and Wappalyzer datasets, which are licensed. Also WordPress.org's own showcase, which self-selects toward flattering examples and cannot be the base of a survey.
Built2026-10-11

The filtering is ours and is disclosed as ours. The source published a list; the decision about which rows of it belong in a cohort was a judgment call, and it is written down so somebody can disagree with it.

Distribution

Where the 423 sites land

GradeShare of the cohort SitesShare
Adequate
180 42.6%
Strong
10 2.4%
Weak
202 47.8%
Not ready
31 7.3%
By dimension

What the cohort earns, dimension by dimension

The mean share of each dimension’s available points that this cohort earned. Low here means the whole sector is weak on it, not that one site dragged an average down. The per-site spread is in the dataset.

DimensionMean share earned Mean
#1 · Reach
These parameters determine the fundamental ease of access that AI has to your site information.
72%
#2 · Read
AI generally turns off JavaScript. Does your site information survive without it?
53%
#3 · Understand
Does a machine know who and what you are?
40%
#4 · Act
Sitemaps, redirects, 404s, licensing terms, and not wasting the crawl budget.
63%
How much of each site we read

The cap is 32 URLs and it is a ceiling, not a promise. A portal whose every link points at a different host yields one page; a university yields the full sample. The median here is 32, the range 1–32, published so that "we sampled 32 URLs per site" cannot become a claim the data does not support.

7 sites in this cohort served a certificate we could not verify. They were read anyway and scored normally, because reporting no response for a site every browser loads would describe our TLS stack rather than the site, and each one carries the finding in its row.

Where this cohort fails

4 tests almost nobody in this cohort passes

Universal — nobody passes these 4 checks · 1 of them worth 2 points or more
TestWhat it asks FailingOf Points
EXT-12 Do you tell search engines the moment a page changes?
100.0%
423 0
EXT-17 Do you list your agents in your domain's DNS records?
100.0%
408 0
EXT-7 If you run real question-and-answer pages, are they marked as such?
100.0%
19 0
UND-2 Does your site use the page labels that search engines still read for what you publish?
100.0%
16 3
Near-universal — 95% and above 7 checks · 1 of them worth 2 points or more
TestWhat it asks FailingOf Points
RED-5 Do your PDFs and images have their own rules for search and quoting?
99.2%
376 1
EXT-16 Do you publish a card or a skills list for the agents you run?
98.8%
423 0
EXT-11 Have you marked the part of a page that answers a spoken question?
98.6%
423 0
EXT-18 Do you tell AI shoppers how they can pay?
98.5%
68 0
RED-10 Do you offer a plain-text (Markdown) copy of your pages?
98.4%
377 2
EXT-14 Does your site offer its actions to AI browsers as tools?
96.9%
417 0
PST-2 Have you posted a Content Signals statement about what AI may do with your content?
96.7%
423 0
Common — 90 to 95% 4 checks · 1 of them worth 2 points or more
TestWhat it asks FailingOf Points
RED-12 If a machine asks for Markdown, does your site give it?
94.6%
423 2
EXT-13 Can an assistant ask your site a question directly?
94.3%
423 0
PST-4 Have you reserved your text and data mining rights in a form machines can read?
92.9%
423 0
EXT-4 Can an AI assistant connect to your site as a tool?
92.7%
423 0

Coral bars mark tests worth 2 points or more, the failures that actually move a score.

Every site

Every 500, named, with a report for each

Whether or not it has been scanned. Rows with no website on record, sites that were unreachable and sites that turned us away stay in the table with the reason on them, and none of them enters an average: dropping them would shrink the population to the part that was easy to measure. A few points between two neighbors is noise. The box filters every row in the cohort, not only the page you are on; click a header to sort the rows on this page by name or by score.

Showing 201–300 of 500 · page 3 of 5

SiteScore GatedPages read Report
nydailynews.com nydailynews.comTranco rank 3630 41 Gated 32
aljazeera.net aljazeera.netTranco rank 3679 50 Gated 32
nexx360.io nexx360.ioTranco rank 3689 69 No 32
themegrill.com themegrill.comTranco rank 3694 49 Gated 32
celtra.com celtra.comTranco rank 3695 68 No 32
elementor.com elementor.comTranco rank 3699 54 Gated 32
yomiuri.co.jp yomiuri.co.jpunreachableTranco rank 3796 — No —
apnic.net apnic.netTranco rank 3799 48 Gated 32
ispconfig.org ispconfig.orgTranco rank 3800 56 No 32
complianz.io complianz.ioTranco rank 3847 61 No 32
permutive.com permutive.comTranco rank 3864 72 No 32
reolink.com reolink.comTranco rank 3939 46 No 32
zimperium.com zimperium.comTranco rank 3980 50 No 32
signifyd.com signifyd.comTranco rank 3984 48 Gated 32
wufoo.com wufoo.comTranco rank 4007 71 No 32
easydns.com easydns.comblockedTranco rank 4105; not measured: HTTP 403 — No —
termly.io termly.ioTranco rank 4162 51 No 32
propublica.org propublica.orgTranco rank 4186 66 Gated 32
swrve.com messagegears.comblockedTranco rank 4220; not measured: HTTP 403 — No —
blender.org blender.orgTranco rank 4234 63 No 32
cnnbrasil.com.br cnnbrasil.com.brTranco rank 4235 50 Gated 31
ecwid.com ecwid.comTranco rank 4265 67 No 32
vanderbilt.edu vanderbilt.eduTranco rank 4300 66 No 32
computerworld.com computerworld.comTranco rank 4306 50 No 1
home.blog home.blogblockedTranco rank 4308; not measured: HTTP 403 — No —
dfn.de dfn.deTranco rank 4326 50 Gated 32
cyberfolks.pl cyberfolks.plTranco rank 4365 60 Gated 32
mobilityware.com mobilityware.comTranco rank 4377 38 Gated 32
cookieadmin.net cookieadmin.netTranco rank 4390 53 Gated 32
camscanner.com camscanner.comTranco rank 4440 56 No 32
1digitech.com 1digitech.comTranco rank 4457 56 No 32
neilpatel.com neilpatel.comblockedTranco rank 4486; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
coxautoinc.com coxautoinc.comTranco rank 4503 66 No 32
recruit.co.jp recruit.co.jpblockedTranco rank 4508; not measured: HTTP 403 — No —
searchenginejournal.com searchenginejournal.comTranco rank 4513 73 No 32
popsci.com popsci.comTranco rank 4523 69 No 32
wsu.edu wsu.eduTranco rank 4529 53 No 32
impact.com impact.comTranco rank 4535 59 No 32
colostate.edu colostate.eduTranco rank 4555 33 Gated 1
groww.in groww.inTranco rank 4584 65 No 32
foreignpolicy.com foreignpolicy.comTranco rank 4602 61 Gated 32
mynavi.jp mynavi.jpTranco rank 4688 57 No 32
msnbc.com ms.nowTranco rank 4692 35 Gated 32
join.chat join.chatTranco rank 4706 63 No 32
ricta.org.rw ricta.org.rwTranco rank 4763 44 Gated 32
onlamp.com oreilly.comTranco rank 4764 50 No 1
hardened-php.net hardened-php.netTranco rank 4779 69 No 3
grab.com grab.comTranco rank 4802 47 No 32
webengage.com webengage.comblockedTranco rank 4824; not measured: HTTP 403 (CloudFront) — No —
nominaltechno.com nt.technologyTranco rank 4841 48 Gated 32
appdome.com appdome.comTranco rank 4870 67 No 32
honeygain.com honeygain.comTranco rank 4879 53 No 17
9mod.com 9mod.comblockedTranco rank 4883; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
harica.gr harica.grTranco rank 4924 70 No 12
liquidweb.com liquidweb.comTranco rank 4967 63 No 32
jivox.com davincicommerce.aiTranco rank 4986 69 No 32
counterpane.com schneier.comblockedTranco rank 4992; not measured: HTTP 403 — No —
intermedia.net intermedia.comunreachableTranco rank 5045 — No —
zoneedit.com zoneedit.comblockedTranco rank 5058; not measured: HTTP 403 — No —
quicksetcloud.com quicksetcloud.comblockedTranco rank 5066; not measured: HTTP 403 — No —
wassenaar.org wassenaar.orgTranco rank 5099 71 No 18
qodeinteractive.com qodeinteractive.comTranco rank 5133 66 No 32
mercurynews.com mercurynews.comTranco rank 5135 56 No 32
infobip.com infobip.comTranco rank 5138 64 No 32
remitly.com remitly.comTranco rank 5148 66 No 32
epfl.ch epfl.chTranco rank 5158 48 No 32
forrester.com forrester.comTranco rank 5169 61 Gated 32
kotaku.com kotaku.comTranco rank 5194 70 No 32
certum.pl certum.plTranco rank 5228 43 No 32
krushmedia.com krushmedia.comTranco rank 5230 63 Gated 19
uic.edu uic.eduTranco rank 5235 41 Gated 32
felenasoft.com felenasoft.comTranco rank 5265 51 No 1
eyeo.com eyeo.comTranco rank 5308 45 No 10
aptrinsic.com gainsight.comTranco rank 5313 66 No 32
sundaysky.com sundaysky.comTranco rank 5343 56 No 32
wedos.cz vedos.czTranco rank 5355 29 Gated 1
aclu.org aclu.orgTranco rank 5361 73 No 1
github.blog github.blogTranco rank 5368 73 No 32
benzinga.com benzinga.comblockedTranco rank 5369; also showed signs of Drupal; the stronger evidence decided; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
fareharbor.com fareharbor.comTranco rank 5393 49 No 32
heroku.com heroku.comTranco rank 5394 40 No 1
athemes.com athemes.comTranco rank 5430 70 No 32
mypurecloud.com genesys.comTranco rank 5432 74 No 32
thinkific.com thinkific.comblockedTranco rank 5433; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
hola.org hola.orgTranco rank 5435 48 Gated 32
media6degrees.com dstillery.comTranco rank 5462 60 Gated 32
yeastar.com yeastar.comTranco rank 5471 46 Gated 32
uni-erlangen.de fau.deTranco rank 5476 57 No 32
imunify360.com imunify360.comblockedTranco rank 5482; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
yorku.ca yorku.caTranco rank 5483 59 Gated 32
apkmirror.com apkmirror.comblockedTranco rank 5492; not measured: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare) — No —
itglue.com itglue.comTranco rank 5500 59 No 32
lbl.gov lbl.govTranco rank 5523 28 Gated 1
sciencealert.com sciencealert.comTranco rank 5527 60 Gated 31
sleepfoundation.org sleepfoundation.orgblockedTranco rank 5552; not measured: HTTP 403 — No —
travelaudience.com amadeus-hospitality.comTranco rank 5557 54 Gated 32
uconn.edu uconn.eduTranco rank 5561 47 Gated 32
blacknight.com blacknight.comTranco rank 5584 64 Gated 32
threatdown.com threatdown.comTranco rank 5622 48 No 32
brivo.com brivo.comTranco rank 5633 58 Gated 32

Scores are for the population, not for ranking two named sites against each other. A few points between neighbors is noise. See what these numbers can and cannot support. Data: sites.csv · checks.csv · summary.json